MIDDLEBURGH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

110

29%

LEVEL 2

152

41%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

95

28%

LEVEL 2

143

42%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

79

44%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

74

41%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

60

37%

LEVEL 2

64

40%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

105

29%

LEVEL 2

145

41%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

87

27%

LEVEL 2

135

42%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

134

46%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

122

45%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

63

78%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

51

70%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

48

25%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

62

34%

LEVEL 2

88

49%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.