Skip to Content
Main content

JOSEPH B RADEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

166

39%

LEVEL 2

129

30%

LEVEL 3

103

24%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

153

39%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

66

33%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

100

44%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

96

46%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

152

38%

LEVEL 2

122

31%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

145

38%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

135

34%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

103

26%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

31

97%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

77

40%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

103

50%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

107

53%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.