Skip to Content
Main content

DUANESBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

96

25%

LEVEL 2

154

39%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

154

43%

LEVEL 3

89

25%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

73

41%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

65

30%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

90

45%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

87

24%

LEVEL 2

150

41%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

145

44%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

146

42%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

149

46%

LEVEL 3

88

27%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

31

74%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

29

81%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

64

21%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

32

39%

LEVEL 2

35

42%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

28

38%

LEVEL 2

31

42%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.