Skip to Content
Main content

DOROTHY NOLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

85

20%

LEVEL 2

151

36%

LEVEL 3

141

34%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

81

20%

LEVEL 2

157

40%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

79

20%

LEVEL 2

143

36%

LEVEL 3

133

34%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

147

40%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

139

35%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

155

42%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

22

81%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

28

90%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

55

16%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

129

37%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

129

39%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

28

44%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.