POTSDAM CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

115

21%

LEVEL 2

222

41%

LEVEL 3

146

27%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

136

26%

LEVEL 2

178

34%

LEVEL 3

137

26%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

67

22%

LEVEL 2

131

44%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

89

30%

LEVEL 2

110

38%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

189
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

111

22%

LEVEL 2

207

41%

LEVEL 3

132

26%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

124

26%

LEVEL 2

173

36%

LEVEL 3

121

25%

LEVEL 4

67

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

59

13%

LEVEL 2

205

44%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

158

35%

LEVEL 3

136

30%

LEVEL 4

73

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

56

76%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

50

70%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

149

39%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

71

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

64

39%

LEVEL 2

73

44%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

83

45%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.