OGDENSBURG CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 712

LEVEL 1

267

38%

LEVEL 2

281

39%

LEVEL 3

138

19%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 745

LEVEL 1

309

41%

LEVEL 2

269

36%

LEVEL 3

140

19%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

113

33%

LEVEL 2

132

39%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

131

37%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

154

41%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

60

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

178

46%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 689

LEVEL 1

259

38%

LEVEL 2

270

39%

LEVEL 3

134

19%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

301

41%

LEVEL 2

262

36%

LEVEL 3

139

19%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

168

28%

LEVEL 2

272

45%

LEVEL 3

137

23%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

200

32%

LEVEL 2

259

41%

LEVEL 3

140

22%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

99

91%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

109

92%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

116

44%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

128

42%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

205

46%

LEVEL 2

165

37%

LEVEL 3

74

16%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

226

51%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

163
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

263

37%

LEVEL 2

281

40%

LEVEL 3

137

19%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

165
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

303

41%

LEVEL 2

268

36%

LEVEL 3

138

19%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.