Skip to Content
Main content

BRASHER FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

197

41%

LEVEL 2

204

43%

LEVEL 3

64

13%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

224

47%

LEVEL 2

159

33%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

81

35%

LEVEL 2

109

47%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

81

35%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

116

48%

LEVEL 2

95

39%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

143

58%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

176

41%

LEVEL 2

185

43%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

206

47%

LEVEL 2

143

33%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

160

37%

LEVEL 2

197

46%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

181

42%

LEVEL 2

154

36%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

37

84%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

43

90%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

92

47%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

68

33%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

139

50%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

26

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

156

58%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.