Skip to Content
Main content

SCHODACK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

92

21%

LEVEL 2

172

39%

LEVEL 3

133

30%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

110

27%

LEVEL 2

162

39%

LEVEL 3

104

25%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

86

42%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

76

33%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

81

20%

LEVEL 2

160

39%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

95

25%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

153

42%

LEVEL 3

128

35%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

62

18%

LEVEL 2

145

42%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

54

69%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

48

72%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

68

18%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

123

33%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

72

22%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

24

35%

LEVEL 2

33

48%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

38

46%

LEVEL 2

32

39%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.