Skip to Content
Main content

HOOSIC VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

131

28%

LEVEL 2

184

39%

LEVEL 3

100

21%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

141

33%

LEVEL 2

165

39%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

82

35%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

127

28%

LEVEL 2

182

40%

LEVEL 3

97

21%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

137

33%

LEVEL 2

159

39%

LEVEL 3

83

20%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

80

19%

LEVEL 2

181

44%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

98

26%

LEVEL 2

157

42%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

51

89%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

43

84%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

75

23%

LEVEL 2

123

38%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

84

29%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

56

38%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

57

43%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.