Skip to Content
Main content

HOOSICK FALLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

120

35%

LEVEL 2

132

39%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

112

33%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

73

40%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

66

43%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

68

43%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

109

34%

LEVEL 2

126

39%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

100

32%

LEVEL 2

130

41%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

78

27%

LEVEL 2

125

43%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

128

45%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

42

82%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

40

77%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

57

29%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

63

43%

LEVEL 2

61

42%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

60

38%

LEVEL 2

71

45%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.