Skip to Content
Main content

PHOENIX CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 880

LEVEL 1

250

28%

LEVEL 2

391

44%

LEVEL 3

179

20%

LEVEL 4

60

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 784

LEVEL 1

273

35%

LEVEL 2

298

38%

LEVEL 3

164

21%

LEVEL 4

49

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

195

44%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

127

32%

LEVEL 2

140

35%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

143

33%

LEVEL 2

196

45%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

146

38%

LEVEL 2

158

41%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 838

LEVEL 1

238

28%

LEVEL 2

371

44%

LEVEL 3

174

21%

LEVEL 4

55

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

255

34%

LEVEL 2

284

38%

LEVEL 3

156

21%

LEVEL 4

46

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 789

LEVEL 1

175

22%

LEVEL 2

375

48%

LEVEL 3

179

23%

LEVEL 4

60

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

207

29%

LEVEL 2

285

41%

LEVEL 3

162

23%

LEVEL 4

49

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

75

82%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

66

81%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

81

18%

LEVEL 2

210

46%

LEVEL 3

118

26%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

134

37%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

169

40%

LEVEL 2

181

43%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

194

46%

LEVEL 2

164

39%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.