Skip to Content
Main content

MEXICO CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 924

LEVEL 1

298

32%

LEVEL 2

371

40%

LEVEL 3

197

21%

LEVEL 4

58

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 841

LEVEL 1

299

36%

LEVEL 2

346

41%

LEVEL 3

154

18%

LEVEL 4

42

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

137

29%

LEVEL 2

183

39%

LEVEL 3

113

24%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

130

30%

LEVEL 2

194

44%

LEVEL 3

90

21%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

161

35%

LEVEL 2

188

41%

LEVEL 3

84

18%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

169

42%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

64

16%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 883

LEVEL 1

283

32%

LEVEL 2

359

41%

LEVEL 3

186

21%

LEVEL 4

55

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 810

LEVEL 1

287

35%

LEVEL 2

335

41%

LEVEL 3

149

18%

LEVEL 4

39

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

163

21%

LEVEL 2

346

46%

LEVEL 3

192

25%

LEVEL 4

58

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 686

LEVEL 1

179

26%

LEVEL 2

313

46%

LEVEL 3

152

22%

LEVEL 4

42

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

135

82%

LEVEL 2

25

15%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

120

77%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

115

23%

LEVEL 2

195

39%

LEVEL 3

137

28%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

95

25%

LEVEL 2

156

41%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

183

43%

LEVEL 2

176

41%

LEVEL 3

60

14%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

204

44%

LEVEL 2

190

41%

LEVEL 3

56

12%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.