Skip to Content
Main content

C J HOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

119

17%

LEVEL 2

294

42%

LEVEL 3

181

26%

LEVEL 4

100

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

137

19%

LEVEL 2

312

43%

LEVEL 3

201

28%

LEVEL 4

77

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

142

40%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

154

43%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

81

24%

LEVEL 2

152

44%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

86

23%

LEVEL 2

158

43%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

16

53%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

74

14%

LEVEL 2

222

41%

LEVEL 3

151

28%

LEVEL 4

90

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

236
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

88

16%

LEVEL 2

226

41%

LEVEL 3

170

31%

LEVEL 4

66

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

50

51%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

34

32%

LEVEL 2

51

48%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

60

10%

LEVEL 2

280

45%

LEVEL 3

178

29%

LEVEL 4

98

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

80

12%

LEVEL 2

292

45%

LEVEL 3

195

30%

LEVEL 4

75

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

59

76%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

57

67%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

281
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 686

LEVEL 1

112

16%

LEVEL 2

293

43%

LEVEL 3

181

26%

LEVEL 4

100

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

278
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

134

19%

LEVEL 2

310

43%

LEVEL 3

201

28%

LEVEL 4

77

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

257
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

70

13%

LEVEL 2

221

40%

LEVEL 3

165

30%

LEVEL 4

92

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

86

15%

LEVEL 2

235

41%

LEVEL 3

174

31%

LEVEL 4

74

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

49

34%

LEVEL 2

73

50%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

51

32%

LEVEL 2

77

49%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.