VICTOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 681

LEVEL 1

91

13%

LEVEL 2

235

35%

LEVEL 3

235

35%

LEVEL 4

120

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

108

16%

LEVEL 2

243

36%

LEVEL 3

230

34%

LEVEL 4

98

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

71

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

185
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

125

39%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

337
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

78

12%

LEVEL 2

210

34%

LEVEL 3

222

36%

LEVEL 4

115

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

311
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

93

15%

LEVEL 2

216

35%

LEVEL 3

218

35%

LEVEL 4

93

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

52

8%

LEVEL 2

209

34%

LEVEL 3

234

38%

LEVEL 4

120

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

57

9%

LEVEL 2

223

37%

LEVEL 3

230

38%

LEVEL 4

97

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

39

59%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

51

71%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

335
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

200

33%

LEVEL 3

222

37%

LEVEL 4

113

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

302
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

205

36%

LEVEL 3

210

37%

LEVEL 4

92

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

28

34%

LEVEL 2

35

42%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

47

42%

LEVEL 2

38

34%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.