SKANEATELES CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

375
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

84

12%

LEVEL 2

231

33%

LEVEL 3

229

33%

LEVEL 4

146

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

377
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 659

LEVEL 1

86

13%

LEVEL 2

196

30%

LEVEL 3

235

36%

LEVEL 4

142

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

211
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

124

37%

LEVEL 4

87

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

123

38%

LEVEL 4

87

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

59

17%

LEVEL 2

132

37%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

365
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

79

12%

LEVEL 2

222

33%

LEVEL 3

226

34%

LEVEL 4

139

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

365
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

82

13%

LEVEL 2

187

29%

LEVEL 3

227

36%

LEVEL 4

138

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

373
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

60

9%

LEVEL 2

218

33%

LEVEL 3

227

35%

LEVEL 4

146

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

374
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

60

10%

LEVEL 2

186

30%

LEVEL 3

232

37%

LEVEL 4

142

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

24

62%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

26

67%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

360
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

64

11%

LEVEL 2

172

29%

LEVEL 3

224

38%

LEVEL 4

136

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

22

35%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.