ONONDAGA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

110

27%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

105

26%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

109

29%

LEVEL 2

162

43%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

91

43%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

91

44%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

74

39%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

76

23%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

73

25%

LEVEL 2

127

43%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

20

54%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

9

69%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

153

46%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

41

77%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

36

77%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

100

45%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

63

39%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

66

42%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.