LAFAYETTE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

151

39%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

130

42%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

59

31%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

76

50%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

92

46%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

73

47%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

70

61%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

29

62%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

73

29%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

68

28%

LEVEL 2

107

45%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

125

41%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

119

49%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

68

79%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

50

81%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

86

45%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

90

54%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

59

51%

LEVEL 2

44

38%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.