Skip to Content
Main content

WESTMORELAND UPPER ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

70

26%

LEVEL 2

124

46%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

85

30%

LEVEL 2

122

43%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

65

49%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

62

42%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

40

29%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

60

45%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

117

46%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

80

30%

LEVEL 2

117

44%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

118

49%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

114

46%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

26

81%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

27

75%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

77

43%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

82

45%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

36

39%

LEVEL 2

47

51%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

47

46%

LEVEL 2

40

39%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.