Skip to Content
Main content

WILSON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

126

21%

LEVEL 2

243

41%

LEVEL 3

157

26%

LEVEL 4

68

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

122

27%

LEVEL 2

181

40%

LEVEL 3

114

25%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

44

22%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

81

25%

LEVEL 2

138

43%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

78

32%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

115

21%

LEVEL 2

229

41%

LEVEL 3

149

27%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

111

26%

LEVEL 2

172

41%

LEVEL 3

108

26%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

62

13%

LEVEL 2

214

43%

LEVEL 3

151

31%

LEVEL 4

67

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

159

42%

LEVEL 3

113

30%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

64

64%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

50

68%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

60

15%

LEVEL 2

161

41%

LEVEL 3

120

31%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

66

33%

LEVEL 2

82

41%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

70

38%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.