NEWFANE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

108

47%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

26

23%

LEVEL 2

51

45%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

51

44%

LEVEL 3

39

34%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

57

49%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

31

29%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

53

24%

LEVEL 2

104

48%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

88

42%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

101

49%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

87

44%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

69

49%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

57

45%

LEVEL 3

47

37%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

31

34%

LEVEL 2

39

43%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

33

35%

LEVEL 2

34

36%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.