Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #31 - STATEN ISLAND GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,400
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,496

LEVEL 1

7,678

29%

LEVEL 2

10,418

39%

LEVEL 3

6,138

23%

LEVEL 4

2,262

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,023
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,366

LEVEL 1

7,179

27%

LEVEL 2

10,164

39%

LEVEL 3

6,426

24%

LEVEL 4

2,597

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,620
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,723

LEVEL 1

3,094

24%

LEVEL 2

5,009

39%

LEVEL 3

3,271

26%

LEVEL 4

1,349

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,062
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,816

LEVEL 1

2,804

22%

LEVEL 2

4,950

39%

LEVEL 3

3,491

27%

LEVEL 4

1,571

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,780
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,773

LEVEL 1

4,584

33%

LEVEL 2

5,409

39%

LEVEL 3

2,867

21%

LEVEL 4

913

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,961
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,550

LEVEL 1

4,375

32%

LEVEL 2

5,214

38%

LEVEL 3

2,935

22%

LEVEL 4

1,026

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

54

50%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

36

31%

LEVEL 2

48

41%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

33

31%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,105
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,115

LEVEL 1

276

13%

LEVEL 2

734

35%

LEVEL 3

703

33%

LEVEL 4

402

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,140
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,082

LEVEL 1

271

13%

LEVEL 2

671

32%

LEVEL 3

689

33%

LEVEL 4

451

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5,533
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,043

LEVEL 1

2,799

20%

LEVEL 2

5,711

41%

LEVEL 3

4,003

29%

LEVEL 4

1,530

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5,861
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,890

LEVEL 1

2,576

19%

LEVEL 2

5,453

39%

LEVEL 3

4,118

30%

LEVEL 4

1,743

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

511
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,562

LEVEL 1

1,818

51%

LEVEL 2

1,233

35%

LEVEL 3

417

12%

LEVEL 4

94

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

556
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,372

LEVEL 1

1,596

47%

LEVEL 2

1,220

36%

LEVEL 3

459

14%

LEVEL 4

97

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,189
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,550

LEVEL 1

2,723

42%

LEVEL 2

2,638

40%

LEVEL 3

966

15%

LEVEL 4

223

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,367
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,765

LEVEL 1

2,670

39%

LEVEL 2

2,728

40%

LEVEL 3

1,083

16%

LEVEL 4

284

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,001
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,521

LEVEL 1

3,850

19%

LEVEL 2

8,670

42%

LEVEL 3

5,788

28%

LEVEL 4

2,213

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,495
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,493

LEVEL 1

2,980

15%

LEVEL 2

8,018

41%

LEVEL 3

5,974

31%

LEVEL 4

2,521

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

399
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,975

LEVEL 1

3,828

64%

LEVEL 2

1,748

29%

LEVEL 3

350

6%

LEVEL 4

49

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

528
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,873

LEVEL 1

4,199

61%

LEVEL 2

2,146

31%

LEVEL 3

452

7%

LEVEL 4

76

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,376
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,240

LEVEL 1

6,743

27%

LEVEL 2

10,121

40%

LEVEL 3

6,117

24%

LEVEL 4

2,259

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,978
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,119

LEVEL 1

6,267

25%

LEVEL 2

9,874

39%

LEVEL 3

6,383

25%

LEVEL 4

2,595

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,256

LEVEL 1

935

74%

LEVEL 2

297

24%

LEVEL 3

21

2%

LEVEL 4

3

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

45
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,247

LEVEL 1

912

73%

LEVEL 2

290

23%

LEVEL 3

43

3%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,833
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,445

LEVEL 1

1,626

16%

LEVEL 2

3,986

38%

LEVEL 3

3,341

32%

LEVEL 4

1,492

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,222
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,552

LEVEL 1

1,454

14%

LEVEL 2

3,876

37%

LEVEL 3

3,482

33%

LEVEL 4

1,740

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,567
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,051

LEVEL 1

6,052

38%

LEVEL 2

6,432

40%

LEVEL 3

2,797

17%

LEVEL 4

770

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,801
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,814

LEVEL 1

5,725

36%

LEVEL 2

6,288

40%

LEVEL 3

2,944

19%

LEVEL 4

857

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.