Skip to Content
Main content

IS 528 BEA FULLER RODGERS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

112

47%

LEVEL 2

103

43%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

106

50%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

62

45%

LEVEL 2

65

47%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

42

36%

LEVEL 2

61

53%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

50

50%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

44

47%

LEVEL 2

45

48%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

108

47%

LEVEL 2

99

43%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

84

41%

LEVEL 2

102

50%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

87

42%

LEVEL 2

96

46%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

96

56%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

28

70%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

24
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

85

41%

LEVEL 2

100

48%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

99

56%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

27

90%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

108

47%

LEVEL 2

99

43%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.