Skip to Content
Main content

GLENWOOD LANDING ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

95

44%

LEVEL 4

49

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

81

40%

LEVEL 4

52

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

47

48%

LEVEL 4

30

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

41

41%

LEVEL 4

35

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

48

41%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

40

40%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

83

43%

LEVEL 4

48

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

70

40%

LEVEL 4

46

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

84

49%

LEVEL 4

49

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

71

42%

LEVEL 4

51

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

14

34%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

92

45%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

80

41%

LEVEL 4

51

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.