Skip to Content
Main content

HARBOR HILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

142

42%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

113

38%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

77

44%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

61

40%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

65

39%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

52

36%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

19

45%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

17

45%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

114

41%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

139

45%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

112

41%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

13

62%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

135

42%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

105

38%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.