Skip to Content
Main content

KLEM ROAD NORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

99

38%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

43

18%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

61

47%

LEVEL 4

23

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

44

40%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

31

24%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

94

40%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

83

37%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

99

43%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

86

38%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

24

89%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

16

94%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

90

39%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

84

38%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

16

52%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.