Skip to Content
Main content

ATTICA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

143

31%

LEVEL 2

174

38%

LEVEL 3

90

20%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

135

33%

LEVEL 2

164

40%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

89

40%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

92

39%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

90

41%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

140

31%

LEVEL 2

169

38%

LEVEL 3

88

20%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

133

33%

LEVEL 2

161

40%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

87

23%

LEVEL 2

157

41%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

153

43%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

56

76%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

44

75%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

118

41%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

112

42%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

84

50%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

67

46%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.