MORRISVILLE-EATON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

127

39%

LEVEL 2

131

40%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

135

43%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

62

37%

LEVEL 2

72

43%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

55

36%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

65

41%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

80

50%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

122

40%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

132

45%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

127

46%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

87

34%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

50

93%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

48

89%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

41

27%

LEVEL 2

66

43%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

53

35%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

86

49%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

82

51%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.