Skip to Content
Main content

CAZENOVIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

76

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

133

39%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

62

37%

LEVEL 4

41

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

41

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

84

45%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

189
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

71

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

132

41%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

76

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

123

40%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

15

50%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

23

66%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

116

39%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

61

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

25

53%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.