Skip to Content
Main content

LITTLE FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

159

32%

LEVEL 2

225

45%

LEVEL 3

89

18%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

164

33%

LEVEL 2

201

41%

LEVEL 3

85

17%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

117

45%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

116

44%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

95

39%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

102

45%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

149

31%

LEVEL 2

218

45%

LEVEL 3

85

18%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

160

33%

LEVEL 2

195

41%

LEVEL 3

83

17%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

99

23%

LEVEL 2

215

50%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

103

24%

LEVEL 2

195

46%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

60

86%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

61

91%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

112

50%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

119

43%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

124

43%

LEVEL 2

126

43%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.