Skip to Content
Main content

POLAND CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

90

31%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

83

34%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

35

28%

LEVEL 2

54

43%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

55

37%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

48

40%

LEVEL 2

49

40%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

82

31%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

79

34%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

111

45%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

101

47%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

41

91%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

31

94%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

64

44%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

58

50%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

62

43%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

65

49%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.