COXSACKIE-ATHENS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 640

LEVEL 1

208

33%

LEVEL 2

259

40%

LEVEL 3

130

20%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

185

32%

LEVEL 2

221

39%

LEVEL 3

119

21%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

125

40%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

68

23%

LEVEL 2

110

38%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

126

38%

LEVEL 2

134

41%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

117

42%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

182

32%

LEVEL 2

228

40%

LEVEL 3

118

21%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

156

31%

LEVEL 2

196

39%

LEVEL 3

109

22%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

15

52%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

154

27%

LEVEL 2

252

44%

LEVEL 3

130

22%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

54

89%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

90

25%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

77

22%

LEVEL 2

137

40%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

118

42%

LEVEL 2

118

42%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

108

48%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.