Skip to Content
Main content

BRUSHTON-MOIRA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

166

47%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

187

55%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

77

43%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

90

50%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

89

51%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

97

60%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

162

46%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

183

55%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

126

41%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

134

47%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

40

87%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

53

93%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

54

36%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

61

47%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

112

54%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

126

60%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

64
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

155

45%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

47
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

179

54%

LEVEL 2

103

31%

LEVEL 3

34

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.