AKRON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

156

23%

LEVEL 2

270

39%

LEVEL 3

182

26%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 669

LEVEL 1

163

24%

LEVEL 2

237

35%

LEVEL 3

178

27%

LEVEL 4

91

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

59

17%

LEVEL 2

131

38%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

67

19%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

97

28%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

96

30%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

78

24%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

38

43%

LEVEL 2

38

43%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

34

40%

LEVEL 2

39

46%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

245
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

117

20%

LEVEL 2

229

39%

LEVEL 3

168

28%

LEVEL 4

77

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

253
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

121

21%

LEVEL 2

194

34%

LEVEL 3

166

29%

LEVEL 4

87

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

100

16%

LEVEL 2

250

41%

LEVEL 3

180

30%

LEVEL 4

80

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

103

17%

LEVEL 2

224

38%

LEVEL 3

177

30%

LEVEL 4

91

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

56

72%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

60

81%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

80

17%

LEVEL 2

186

39%

LEVEL 3

149

31%

LEVEL 4

67

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

81

18%

LEVEL 2

152

34%

LEVEL 3

143

32%

LEVEL 4

74

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

76

37%

LEVEL 2

84

41%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

82

37%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.