A J SCHMIDT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

59

38%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

57

41%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

29

35%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

29

43%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

30

41%

LEVEL 2

31

42%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

28

39%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

11

65%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

42

33%

LEVEL 2

53

41%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

42

39%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

36

29%

LEVEL 2

52

41%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

36

31%

LEVEL 2

50

43%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

23

74%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

21

91%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

17

24%

LEVEL 2

29

40%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

17

29%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

42

49%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

40

49%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.