Skip to Content
Main content

IROQUOIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

213

36%

LEVEL 3

208

35%

LEVEL 4

100

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

62

14%

LEVEL 2

165

37%

LEVEL 3

152

34%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

114

37%

LEVEL 4

61

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

86

39%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

294
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

70

12%

LEVEL 2

206

36%

LEVEL 3

197

35%

LEVEL 4

97

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

58

14%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

143

34%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

190

37%

LEVEL 3

203

39%

LEVEL 4

100

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

148

38%

LEVEL 3

152

39%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

50

64%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

32

65%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

287
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

65

12%

LEVEL 2

184

34%

LEVEL 3

191

36%

LEVEL 4

96

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

134

35%

LEVEL 3

140

37%

LEVEL 4

60

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

29

47%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

17

27%

LEVEL 2

31

50%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.