Skip to Content
Main content

GRIFFITH INST MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

104

25%

LEVEL 2

168

41%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

124

33%

LEVEL 2

157

42%

LEVEL 3

66

18%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

74

35%

LEVEL 2

90

42%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

77

41%

LEVEL 2

79

42%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

95

25%

LEVEL 2

154

41%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

117

34%

LEVEL 2

142

41%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

163

44%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

86

26%

LEVEL 2

153

46%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

30

83%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

38

90%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

110

40%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

58

43%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

53

39%

LEVEL 2

62

46%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.