Skip to Content
Main content

EDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

168

25%

LEVEL 2

261

39%

LEVEL 3

186

28%

LEVEL 4

61

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

156

25%

LEVEL 2

243

39%

LEVEL 3

174

28%

LEVEL 4

57

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

98

32%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

243
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 659

LEVEL 1

162

25%

LEVEL 2

254

39%

LEVEL 3

183

28%

LEVEL 4

60

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

224
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

148

24%

LEVEL 2

239

39%

LEVEL 3

168

27%

LEVEL 4

56

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

93

16%

LEVEL 2

240

42%

LEVEL 3

182

32%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

94

17%

LEVEL 2

217

40%

LEVEL 3

171

32%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

75

75%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

62

68%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

117

22%

LEVEL 2

208

38%

LEVEL 3

159

29%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

106

21%

LEVEL 2

188

37%

LEVEL 3

158

31%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

51

38%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

50

39%

LEVEL 2

55

43%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.