Skip to Content
Main content

HARRIS HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

106

36%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

111

41%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

59

40%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

58

40%

LEVEL 4

39

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

30

24%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

53

42%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

98

36%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

102

41%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

105

44%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

105

46%

LEVEL 4

55

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

34

62%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

33

70%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

96

37%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

53

23%

LEVEL 3

93

40%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

18

44%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.