CHEEKTOWAGA-SLOAN UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

219

34%

LEVEL 2

275

43%

LEVEL 3

117

18%

LEVEL 4

34

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

230

38%

LEVEL 2

244

40%

LEVEL 3

101

17%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

86

27%

LEVEL 2

149

47%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

93

32%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

133

41%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

137

43%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

188

32%

LEVEL 2

253

43%

LEVEL 3

112

19%

LEVEL 4

31

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

195

36%

LEVEL 2

222

41%

LEVEL 3

96

18%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

22

69%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

19

61%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

122

23%

LEVEL 2

252

48%

LEVEL 3

115

22%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

138

28%

LEVEL 2

220

45%

LEVEL 3

100

20%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

97

80%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

92

79%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

81

28%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

68

28%

LEVEL 2

94

38%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

138

39%

LEVEL 2

154

44%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

162

45%

LEVEL 2

150

41%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.