Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN F KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

105

31%

LEVEL 2

162

48%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

100

34%

LEVEL 2

117

40%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

44

26%

LEVEL 2

92

54%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

67

46%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

61

37%

LEVEL 2

70

42%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

62

42%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

90

29%

LEVEL 2

153

49%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

110

40%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

13

81%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

65

23%

LEVEL 2

149

53%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

107

43%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

40

75%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

34

77%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

68

49%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

70

36%

LEVEL 2

94

48%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

68

39%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.