Skip to Content
Main content

PS 69 HOUGHTON ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

163

49%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

161

48%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

65

40%

LEVEL 2

69

43%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

63

40%

LEVEL 2

69

44%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

98

57%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

98

56%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

82

47%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

67

41%

LEVEL 2

71

44%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

61

51%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

64

54%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

16

57%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

21

64%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

92

38%

LEVEL 2

112

46%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

102

39%

LEVEL 2

113

44%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

71

81%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

59

80%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

28

42%

LEVEL 2

32

48%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

34

42%

LEVEL 2

35

43%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

135

51%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

127

50%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.