Skip to Content
Main content

MARATHON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

110

37%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

132

46%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

50

34%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

55

39%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

60

39%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

77

51%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

104

36%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

123

44%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

64

27%

LEVEL 2

101

42%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

46

78%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

55

81%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

42

31%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

39

35%

LEVEL 2

43

38%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

68

42%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

93

53%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.