HOMER INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

203

38%

LEVEL 2

181

34%

LEVEL 3

117

22%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

149

37%

LEVEL 2

143

36%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

126

45%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

92

42%

LEVEL 2

75

34%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

198

38%

LEVEL 2

176

34%

LEVEL 3

110

21%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

142

37%

LEVEL 2

142

37%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

138

30%

LEVEL 2

172

37%

LEVEL 3

117

25%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

120

33%

LEVEL 2

139

38%

LEVEL 3

88

24%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

65

88%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

29

88%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

73

25%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

130

55%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

102

55%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.