Skip to Content
Main content

MCGRAW CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

95

38%

LEVEL 2

103

41%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

104

44%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

45

35%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

48

40%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

50

41%

LEVEL 2

53

43%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

56

49%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

87

37%

LEVEL 2

99

42%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

96

44%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

96

46%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

63

34%

LEVEL 2

84

45%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

36

82%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

41

84%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

35

30%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

36

33%

LEVEL 2

45

41%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

60

45%

LEVEL 2

54

40%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

68

54%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.