Skip to Content
Main content

TACONIC HILLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

260

40%

LEVEL 2

248

38%

LEVEL 3

112

17%

LEVEL 4

25

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

289

44%

LEVEL 2

226

35%

LEVEL 3

107

16%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

107

34%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

120

39%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

153

47%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

43

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

169

50%

LEVEL 2

119

35%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

17

68%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

222

39%

LEVEL 2

215

38%

LEVEL 3

103

18%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

233

42%

LEVEL 2

196

36%

LEVEL 3

93

17%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

22

46%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

29

51%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

171

31%

LEVEL 2

241

44%

LEVEL 3

111

20%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

89

92%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

100

33%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

160

47%

LEVEL 2

137

40%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

137
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 640

LEVEL 1

256

40%

LEVEL 2

247

39%

LEVEL 3

112

18%

LEVEL 4

25

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.