Skip to Content
Main content

NORTHEASTERN CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

175

29%

LEVEL 2

264

44%

LEVEL 3

126

21%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

208

36%

LEVEL 2

234

40%

LEVEL 3

113

20%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

129

46%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

84

29%

LEVEL 2

121

42%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

116

37%

LEVEL 2

135

43%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

124

43%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

165

30%

LEVEL 2

245

44%

LEVEL 3

118

21%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

199

36%

LEVEL 2

221

40%

LEVEL 3

108

20%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

92

19%

LEVEL 2

241

49%

LEVEL 3

123

25%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

118

25%

LEVEL 2

218

46%

LEVEL 3

112

24%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

83

76%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

90

83%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

151

46%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

132

45%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

104

39%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

134

47%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.