Skip to Content
Main content

BEEKMANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

132

30%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

103

24%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

156

39%

LEVEL 2

156

39%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

83

45%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

106

50%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

125

30%

LEVEL 2

146

35%

LEVEL 3

100

24%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

149

39%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

63

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

86

27%

LEVEL 2

146

46%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

72

78%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

70

85%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

79

44%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

92

43%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

113

52%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.