SHERBURNE-EARLVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

205

37%

LEVEL 2

215

38%

LEVEL 3

97

17%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

204

42%

LEVEL 2

177

36%

LEVEL 3

77

16%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

104

37%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

82

36%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

101

36%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

122

47%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

200

37%

LEVEL 2

208

38%

LEVEL 3

97

18%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

197

42%

LEVEL 2

172

36%

LEVEL 3

74

16%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

107

25%

LEVEL 2

191

45%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

105

29%

LEVEL 2

158

43%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

98

75%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

99

81%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

146

45%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

146

50%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

137
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

200

36%

LEVEL 2

212

39%

LEVEL 3

95

17%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

105
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

198

42%

LEVEL 2

174

36%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.