Skip to Content
Main content

CHAUTAUQUA LAKE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

90

27%

LEVEL 2

131

39%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

114

32%

LEVEL 2

134

37%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

74

38%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

86

27%

LEVEL 2

127

39%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

106

31%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

83

24%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

126

43%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

79

25%

LEVEL 2

130

40%

LEVEL 3

84

26%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

32

86%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

35

88%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

41

34%

LEVEL 2

52

43%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

60

37%

LEVEL 2

68

42%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.