Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTHERN CAYUGA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

125

39%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

46

31%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

77

44%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

75

41%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

107

37%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

107

37%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

47

92%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

51

89%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

118

37%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

76

54%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

78

54%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

91
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

120

38%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

80
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

122

38%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.